Sunday, September 29, 2013

Speech in Lyon - La FAGE

27.09.2013

Dear Delegates,

First of all, l would like to thank La FAGE Board for inviting me to this assembly. It is a pleasure to be here with these kindly people and discuss the current student problems in Higher Education.

To begin with, l would like to shortly introduce myself. My name is Ozan Demirer, from Turkey. I finished my bachelor on Material Science and Engineering in Istanbul and now I’m a master student in ETH Zurich on Industrial Management. I have 3 years experiences related to student unions in both national and international levels. I inform you about one important point. The comments and examinations that l will share with you during my speech, are only individual and my analysis, not reflects the perception of any union in Turkey.

I would like to make my speech mainly on 4 topics; History and current situation in Higher Education Institutions in Turkey, Student Representation System, State’s consideration on the youth and policies on Higher Education, Impacts of youth on society during recent movements and protests.

1-   History and current situation in Higher Education Institutions in Turkey

In the history of Turkish Republic, the institutions were not enough for young people’s education during the first years of the country, however in mid-80’s, there has been a huge leap forward from non-educated to highly educated society with establishing new higher education institutions as you can see from figures. Although there were 82 universities before 2006, 95 new universities are founded after this year. In 2013, there are 107 state universities, 67 foundation universities, in total 175 universities and there are more than 4.5 million students are studying in these institutions.

I would like to briefly talk about the structure of the Higher Education. There is an institution called Council of Higher Education, located in Ankara, which has the function of regulating the Higher Education System. It is an autonomous institution and every university has to obey the regulations of this council. This council has been found during the military regime in 1982 and it has been used by every political power for ideological reasons which have bad impacts on the independency of the universities and independent-thinking environment.  

2-   Student representation system in Turkey

Student organization culture has a long history with some associations. Many student unions, councils and associations have been founded and some of them have been closed down in the last century. However, nationwide systematic representation has started in 2006 as named National Student Council with a well-structured organization chart and election system. The election system consists of two levels; university level and national level.
In the university level, the student representatives are selected in 3 steps;
·         First, representative of the department is selected (Ex; the representative of Mechanical Engineering Department)
·         Second, representative of the faculty is selected among the elected students from departments. (Ex; the representative of Engineering Faculty)
·         In the last stage, representative of the university is selected among faculty representatives.
In national level, there are general assemblies for elections and all universities’ student representatives’ vote for next 2 years’ new board. The council has a rigid structure with an executive board, supervisory committee and several commissions.

3-   State’s consideration on the youth population and policies on higher education

Perception of the state on youth movements has been varied during history in Turkey. In late 60’s, student movements in Paris has affected the Turkey’s youth population with a libertarian engagements. These ideological changes have boosted the activist movements of young people and the state had acted on them with an intolerance way. Many of the young leaders have been arrested, tortured and unfortunately, 3 of the young leaders executed by hanging. In fact, some of them have committed several crimes which had to be punished however the end of the story should not be in this way.

Before the military coup in 1980, there were several student and youth associations based on different ideologies such as communism, nationalism and conservatism; however the state had closed every association after the coup, even many political parties. In truth, there were several homicides and crimes which have been supported by these organizations however, the vital source of these actions were the being used of the young people by political parties according to their political benefits.

Unfortunately, this situation is not changed in today’s Turkey. There are several student associations which have connections with political parties beyond the appropriate level. On the other hand, it is an important opportunity for these associations’ youth members in order to gain experiences related to NGO’s and political parties however the threatening point is, in several cases the members are stuck in ideological rigidity which is formed by politicians. These circumstances push the new generation from a rational position to a more narrow-minded and obedient position. As a consequence, the society has been transformed into a population -both from left and right fractions- which have a lack of judgment of political issues and following the leaders and their ideologies blindly.  

In the history of many Turkish states and empires, the organizational culture is generally based on central power in several areas and the effect of this centralized control culture would be clearly seen in Higher Education. Several dynamics of the institutions is being supervised and regulated by Council of Higher Education. In some cases, this regulation power has an important role for having a sustainable education policy, such as supervising the competency of the institutions in a legal track. However, the regulatory system of higher education has also several negative effects on independency of the universities. In order to obtain independent-thinking environment in higher education institutions, the rules would not be so strictly regulated by one unique authority, unfortunately in Turkey, this authoritarian system dramatically decreases universities' flexibility to form their own strategy and culture. Moreover, this system strongly lowers the universities' competitiveness which would have helped for having a higher level of education. In the last 2 decades, many political parties give promises to the society on their election campaigns for closing down this institution however parties in the power did not keep these promises.

In last decades, state considers the new generation as a significant opportunity for Turkey’s future because the age average of the country is approximately 30, where the population is above 75 million. This young population would create a massive workforce for further development of the country however; it is also a disadvantage at the same time. Low wage rates, high youth unemployment rate and uninsured employment are some of the problematical points for the young population. Education plays a significant role for the solution. For instance, there are several gaps in job market related to intermediate positions for industry which seeks the skilled graduates that is between non educated people and university graduates. However the vocational high schools and the vocational higher education institutions have several problems such as low quality of the education and low interest of the students to these institutions. National Education policies could not create a solution for this problem; therefore, Higher Education policies are not sufficient to solve this issue.  Another problem related to higher education is the unemployment of the new graduates from faculty of education. The government appointments are not sufficient for meeting the demand of the national education system and the unemployment rate of these graduates grows year by year.

As I have presented the statistics in the introduction part, there has been a dramatic increase of the numbers of higher education institutions in last 2 decades. This transformation process is so significant for a developing country in order to have a society, which has been integrated with today’s global world; however the education’s quality in universities is a matter as important as the quantity of the institutions. In last years, the unemployment rates of the university graduates increases and one fifth of the unemployed people have graduated from a higher education institution at the moment due to the low quality of the higher education.
All in all, the policy for increasing the number of university graduates has an outcome for enhancing the average level of education in society. In my opinion, this policy has to be continued with keeping the amount of the higher education bodies constant and increasing the quality in existed institutions in order to obtain a sustainable and world-class higher education system, otherwise, these hundreds of institutions would just create some statistics and artificially decreased unemployment rate.

4-    Impacts of youth on society during recent movements and protests.

First of all, the protestor groups have to be divided into two fractions, first fraction which has shown the reaction with attempts to damage some public goods, the second fraction which made these movements unique. You can also see some important demographic statistics related to this second fraction that protesting peacefully. There were several reasons for these series of protests which has been started in May 2013.  Some reasons were usage of state-funds, environmental concerns, changes regarding national education policies, judicial troubles such as extremely long times in custody. However, they were only small parts of the puzzle.  The main point which made this movement unique is the start of showing the active reaction of the people, who was considered as a passive, internet addicted and apolitical young generation. The reaction would be seen only directed to party in the power, however fundamentally the movement has also targeted the opposition parties due to their stagnant and ineffective opposition strategies. There were always two parts of the young generation through the history of Turkey; one part who has been engaged with political issues and the other part who consistently positioned themselves far away from politics. This apolitical part was also affected and moved away from politics due to previous generation’s bad experience from military coup in 1980. Therefore, if we look at the whole picture, there has been a huge politically new engaged generation from several ideologies, both conservatives and liberals, which has boosted the participation of people in national politics.

In my way of thinking, the young people’s activation would be critically important for having a more participant democracy and in the long term, it would also give more responsibilities in decision-taking positions in politics and increase the paying importance of the government and society to young generations.

At the end, I would like to thank again to the Board of La FAGE for inviting me to this congress.

Thank you for listening me, Merci de m'avoir écouté.


Lyon


29.09.2013

Fransa'da ulusal çapta öğrenci temsiliyetinde bulunan derneklerden biri olan La FAGE, beni 26-28 Eylül 2013 tarihleri arasında yapılacak genel kurul'una davet etti. Konu ise genel olarak Türkiye'deki üniversite problemleri ve devletin gençler üzerindeki algısıydı ve bu iki konuyu 12-13 dakika içerisinde anlatmam istenmişti tabi zaman kısıtlamasını ve konuları karşılaştırınca durumu biraz komik bulduğumu söylemem gerek. YÖK'ün kaldırılması isteği, eğitim fakültelerinin sıkıntısı, mezunların iş bulma problemi, kılık kıyafet sebebi ile sıkıntı çeken öğrenciler, vs vs. Özellikle devletin genç nüfus üzerindeki algısı, araştırırken ciddi anlamda ilgimi çekti çünkü bu konuyu yazıya dökmeye başladığımda, ne kadar farklı olaylar yaşandığını görüyorsunuz. Bir yandan asılan 3 genç, diğer yandan devlet tarafından kullanılanlar, bir yanda devletin ülkenin en büyük dinamosu olarak gördüğü genç nüfus oranı. Konuşmayı hazırlarken birkez daha farkına vardım ki Türkiye'deki üniversite sisteminin ilerlemesi için düzeltilmesi gereken birçok nokta var ancak bazı sıkıntılar, ülkenin yönetim kültüründen kaynaklandığı için çözülmesi uzun zaman alacağını düşünüyorum. Konuşma metninin tamamını ayrı bir yazı olarak bloga koyacağım. 

Konuşma ile ilgili yorumlarımdan önce Zürih'ten sonra Fransa'nın bana ne kadar iyi geldiğinden bahsetmem gerek. Geçen nisan ve mayıs aylarında Türk arkadaşlarım ile bu konudan uzun uzun konuşuyorduk. Mesele kısaca şu; Zürih'te öğrenci olmanın eğitim anlamında, teorik olarak, (kültürel çeşitliliğin yarattığı tecrübe de eklenebilir) kısacası entellektüel açıdan ne kadar doyurucu ve tatmin edici bir yer olduğu ancak bir o kadar da duygusal ve ruhsal açıdan insanı aç bıraktığı. Markette, barda, restaurantlarda kısaca birçok alanda insanlar, genelde size çok nazik davranıyorlar ama hep bir eksiklik var, hep bir koşturma, hep bir ev-iş-ev-iş, kısacası çalışmak için yaşıyoruz sen de öyle olmalısın mesajı hissediliyor. Aslında 2011 yazında Almanya'da staj yaparken Zürih'in bu konuda daha yaşanılabilir bir yer olduğunu düşünmüştüm ancak tüm bu durumlar, insanda bir süre sonra farkına tam varılamayan bir eksiklik yaratıyor. Lyon'da ise bu durumun biraz farklı olduğunu gördüm, insanlar biraz daha duyguları ile yaşıyor, yahu sabah kruvasan alırken bile; "parayı öde, işine git" havası oluşmuyor." Bunun sebeplerinden biri belki de Fransızca Almanca farkı bile olabilir. Belki de Zürih'te olduğu gibi Lyon'da da uzun süre yaşasam, burası için de aynısını düşüneceğim ama bu duygumdan bahsetmeden bu yazıyı bitiremem.

Konuşmayı yaparken ilk defa başıma gelen bir durum oldu. Fransız delegelerin birçoğu İngilizce bilmedikleri için İngilizcesi iyi olan bir arkadaşım ardıl çeviri yaptı ve böyle bir çeviri, ilk defa tecrübe ettiğim bir durumdu. Hiç hoş bir durum değilmiş çünkü konuşmanız durmadan kesiliyor, vurgulama sıkıntısı oluşuyur, konsantre olamıyorsunuz, yazıya döktüğünüz düşünceleri duygularınızı katarak aktaramıyorsunuz ki konuşurken en önem verdiğim bu noktanın eksikliği beni çok rahatsız etti. Belki yeteri kadar tecrübeli olmadığım için bu sıkıntıları yaşadım ancak tatmin oldum mu diye sorarsanız , hayır derim; fakat bu da farklı bir tecrübe olarak bende kaldı.

Avrupa Öğrenci Birliği toplantılarından tanıdığım Fransız Delegelerden biri, bana yazın yaptığı geziden bahsetti. İstanbul'dan başlayıp, pamukkale, kapadokya, van, ağrı, Ermenistan ve Azerbaycan diye uzanan bir yol haritası çizdi ve son zamanlarda birçok konferansta, gerek özel konuşmalarda gerek sunumlarda altını çizdiğim bir noktanın aynısından bana söz etti. Dedikleri genel mahiyeti ile; ülkemizin ve bulunduğumuz coğrafyanın çok güzel, kesinlikle gezmeye değer olduğu ile ilgiliydi. Ancak yorumundaki bamteli, Türkiye sınırları içerisindeki bambaşka kültürlerin bir arada oluşuydu. İstanbul, Denizli, Konya ve Van örneklerini verdi ve böyle bir çeşitlilik beklemediğinden söz etti. Hep kullanılan ama bizlerin BİLE gezip görmediği için farkında olmadığımız "kültür mozaiği" sözü aslında altının mutlaka doldurulması gereken ve derin anlamlar içeren bir söz. Keşke içimizde batı merakımızın yarısı kadar geleneklerini korumuş gerçek Anadolu insanının yaşayışı ve kültürü ile ilgili bir merak olsa...

 Konusma sonrasi panelden bir kare
 Gala gecesinde delegeler ile sohbet ederken
Ilk aksamki sehir turu, kilise isiklandirmasi gayet basariliydi